Health: Since the discovery of penicillin in 1928, antibiotics have played a critical role in protecting public health by killing or inhibiting the growth of dangerous bacteria. But from the earliest days of the ‘antibiotic era,’ drugs – including tetracyclines, penicillin, and tylosin – have been approved for a parallel use: in livestock that are destined to become food. And even though sales of “medically important” antibiotics for use in animal agriculture have dropped 25 percent since 2010, the National Resources Defense Council (NRDC) calculates that 65 percent of the antibiotics sold in the US are still given to livestock. Since a peak in 2015, ag sales of antibiotics had been decreasing, but a new Food and Drug Administration (FDA) report shows that overall sales are ticking up for the second year in a row.
Antibiotic Sales for Use in Human Medicine vs. Food Animal Production (2018)
While antibiotic use may seem like a new issue, the drugs have been used in agriculture since 1950 to help livestock with:
- Treatment & Prevention: The lack of activity paired with unsanitary conditions in concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs) compromises animals’ immune systems and leads to respiratory diseases (i.e., dust pneumonia and heat stress) and liver abscesses caused by high grain diets. Rather than shift the flawed model of protein production, antibiotics are routinely given to industrially raised livestock to treat or control illnesses and outbreaks. Many industrial livestock producers give healthy animals small doses of antibiotics on a daily basis to prevent illness in overcrowded, stressful conditions. This technique, otherwise known as subtherapeutic antibiotic therapy (STAT), has also made it irresistible for CAFOs to pack more livestock into cramped facilities – even as the practice threatens to breed antibiotic-resistant “superbugs” and diminish the effectiveness of drugs that are important in the care of human beings.
- Growth Promotion: CAFOs are also guilty of overusing antibiotics in a nondescript manner. Instead of treating or preventing disease, the drugs are incorporated into animal feed and water to lower fodder costs and increase animal protein production. In short, antibiotics are adept at killing off certain bacteria that populate animals’ guts – making more of the energy in the food available for the animals themselves. This helps livestock rapidly convert feed into muscle more efficiently. It wasn’t until the early 1970s that Americans began lobbying to ban STAT from the farm. In 2017, the FDA implemented Guidance for Industry #213 – restricting antibiotics for production purposes (i.e., growth promotion), which accounted for 15 percent of livestock drug use. However, the restriction fails to address antibiotic use for disease prevention – allowing CAFOs to use the same drugs to promote general health.
Medically Important Antibiotics Sold (US) for Cattle Production, Other Livestock Production and Human Medicine (2018)
One of the Biggest Threats to Global Health
Nowadays, it is nearly impossible to decouple the misuse of antibiotics in animal agriculture from the emergence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) – the ability of bacteria or other microbes to resist the effects of a drug after being exposed to them. As more antibiotics are used, especially for long periods of time in low doses in cramped CAFO conditions, they can mutate to resist those drugs. The new drug-resistant bacteria population can then be passed from animals to humans via the animal products themselves, feedlot workers, and the environment (i.e., animal waste or wastewater). Once resistant bacteria enter the food supply, drugs normally used to treat people infected with those bacteria may not work. A 2019 Centers for Disease Control report found antibiotic-resistant bacteria cause 2.8 million infections and 35,000 deaths annually in the US. Moreover, AMR costs our country $55 billion every year ($20 billion for health care and $35 billion for loss of productivity).
With this in mind, it is not surprising that the World Health Organization (WHO) identifies antibiotic resistance as “one of the biggest threats to global health” today. And by 2050, the frequent use of antibiotics to promote animal growth threatens to initiate a post-antibiotic era, which will cost the global economy up to $100 trillion – causing nearly 10 million deaths per year. In this not too distant future, simple surgeries could be too risky to attempt, and common diseases – respiratory tract infections, urinary tract infections, etc. – could be untreatable. Just like with humans, the increase in AMR will make animal treatments ineffective and render infections fatal. And if trends in AMR don’t slow, there will be an 11 percent drop in livestock production within the next thirty years.
Preserving the Benefits of Antibiotics
While consumers can try and control their own exposure to antibiotics, systems-level reform is necessary. Beyond policy reform, producers must stop relying on antibiotics to maximize output and cover up flaws in the system rather than fix the system. Since many critics claim that it’d be too expensive to implement natural methods for protecting animals from disease – e.g., enlarging barns to reduce crowding – at scale, a new wave of companies are launching non-antibiotic products that can prevent disease and improve feed conversion. Ocean Harvest Technology, for instance, markets a seaweed-based additive that reduces antibiotic use while Pando Nutrition and ProAgni are commercializing pre- pro- and postbiotics that promote a healthy animal microbiome. In doing so, livestock producers can keep the benefits of antibiotics without harming the animal, the environment, or human health.
In truth, the only way to slow the emergence of drug-resistant bacteria is by using antibiotics conservatively. Unfortunately, the blanket application of drugs for industrial livestock production unabashedly violates this rule. Yet with the recent change in administration, organizations are calling for immediate action from Biden to act on the antibiotic resistance crisis. It is imperative that we set a national target to reduce antibiotic use in livestock, establish a system to track data on AMR, and ensure that producers accurately report their on-farm antibiotic use. Meanwhile, the increase in consumer demand for antibiotic-free animal products will help to usher in a model where livestock are raised without growth promoters or preventive antibiotic use.
Watch: Using microscopic footage, harrowing personal stories, and expert insights RESISTANCE clarifies the problem of antibiotic resistance, how we got to this point, and what we can do to turn the tide. In talking-head interviews with experts, the documentary explains the fundamental reason why the overuse of antibiotics is so dangerous: Every time we use antibiotics, we give bacteria another chance to develop resistance to it. Director Michael Graziano goes one step further by exploring what the future of medicine might look like without antibiotics.